29 Aralık 2018 Cumartesi

Porter’s Five Forces Model of Competition

Michael Porter (Harvard Business School Management Researcher) designed various vital frameworks for developing an organization’s strategy. One of the most renowned among managers making strategic decisions is the five competitive forces model that determines industry structure. According to Porter, the nature of competition in any industry is personified in the following five forces:
  1. Threat of new potential entrants
  2. Threat of substitute product/services
  3. Bargaining power of suppliers
  4. Bargaining power of buyers
  5. Rivalry among current competitors
Porters Five Forces Model of Competition 
FIGURE: Porter’s Five Forces model
The five forces mentioned above are very significant from point of view of strategy formulation. The potential of these forces differs from industry to industry. These forces jointly determine the profitability of industry because they shape the prices which can be charged, the costs which can be borne, and the investment required to compete in the industry. Before making strategic decisions, the managers should use the five forces framework to determine the competitive structure of industry.
Let’s discuss the five factors of Porter’s model in detail:
  1. Risk of entry by potential competitors: Potential competitors refer to the firms which are not currently competing in the industry but have the potential to do so if given a choice. Entry of new players increases the industry capacity, begins a competition for market share and lowers the current costs. The threat of entry by potential competitors is partially a function of extent of barriers to entry. The various barriers to entry are-
    • Economies of scale
    • Brand loyalty
    • Government Regulation
    • Customer Switching Costs
    • Absolute Cost Advantage
    • Ease in distribution
    • Strong Capital base
  2. Rivalry among current competitors: Rivalry refers to the competitive struggle for market share between firms in an industry. Extreme rivalry among established firms poses a strong threat to profitability. The strength of rivalry among established firms within an industry is a function of following factors:
    • Extent of exit barriers
    • Amount of fixed cost
    • Competitive structure of industry
    • Presence of global customers
    • Absence of switching costs
    • Growth Rate of industry
    • Demand conditions
  3. Bargaining Power of Buyers: Buyers refer to the customers who finally consume the product or the firms who distribute the industry’s product to the final consumers. Bargaining power of buyers refer to the potential of buyers to bargain down the prices charged by the firms in the industry or to increase the firms cost in the industry by demanding better quality and service of product. Strong buyers can extract profits out of an industry by lowering the prices and increasing the costs. They purchase in large quantities. They have full information about the product and the market. They emphasize upon quality products. They pose credible threat of backward integration. In this way, they are regarded as a threat.
  4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Suppliers refer to the firms that provide inputs to the industry. Bargaining power of the suppliers refer to the potential of the suppliers to increase the prices of inputs( labour, raw materials, services, etc) or the costs of industry in other ways. Strong suppliers can extract profits out of an industry by increasing costs of firms in the industry. Suppliers products have a few substitutes. Strong suppliers’ products are unique. They have high switching cost. Their product is an important input to buyer’s product. They pose credible threat of forward integration. Buyers are not significant to strong suppliers. In this way, they are regarded as a threat.
  5. Threat of Substitute products: Substitute products refer to the products having ability of satisfying customers needs effectively. Substitutes pose a ceiling (upper limit) on the potential returns of an industry by putting a setting a limit on the price that firms can charge for their product in an industry. Lesser the number of close substitutes a product has, greater is the opportunity for the firms in industry to raise their product prices and earn greater profits (other things being equal).
The power of Porter’s five forces varies from industry to industry. Whatever be the industry, these five forces influence the profitability as they affect the prices, the costs, and the capital investment essential for survival and competition in industry. This five forces model also help in making strategic decisions as it is used by the managers to determine industry’s competitive structure.
Porter ignored, however, a sixth significant factor- complementaries. This term refers to the reliance that develops between the companies whose products work is in combination with each other. Strong complementors might have a strong positive effect on the industry. Also, the five forces model overlooks the role of innovation as well as the significance of individual firm differences. It presents a stagnant view of competition

Business Policy - Definition and Features

Definition of Business Policy

Business Policy defines the scope or spheres within which decisions can be taken by the subordinates in an organization. It permits the lower level management to deal with the problems and issues without consulting top level management every time for decisions.
Business policies are the guidelines developed by an organization to govern its actions. They define the limits within which decisions must be made. Business policy also deals with acquisition of resources with which organizational goals can be achieved. Business policy is the study of the roles and responsibilities of top level management, the significant issues affecting organizational success and the decisions affecting organization in long-run.

Features of Business Policy

An effective business policy must have following features-
  1. Specific- Policy should be specific/definite. If it is uncertain, then the implementation will become difficult.
  2. Clear- Policy must be unambiguous. It should avoid use of jargons and connotations. There should be no misunderstandings in following the policy.
  3. Reliable/Uniform- Policy must be uniform enough so that it can be efficiently followed by the subordinates.
  4. Appropriate- Policy should be appropriate to the present organizational goal.
  5. Simple- A policy should be simple and easily understood by all in the organization.
  6. Inclusive/Comprehensive- In order to have a wide scope, a policy must be comprehensive.
  7. Flexible- Policy should be flexible in operation/application. This does not imply that a policy should be altered always, but it should be wide in scope so as to ensure that the line managers use them in repetitive/routine scenarios.
  8. Stable- Policy should be stable else it will lead to indecisiveness and uncertainty in minds of those who look into it for guidance.

Difference between Policy and Strategy

The term “policy” should not be considered as synonymous to the term “strategy”. The difference between policy and strategy can be summarized as follows-
  1. Policy is a blueprint of the organizational activities which are repetitive/routine in nature. While strategy is concerned with those organizational decisions which have not been dealt/faced before in same form.
  2. Policy formulation is responsibility of top level management. While strategy formulation is basically done by middle level management.
  3. Policy deals with routine/daily activities essential for effective and efficient running of an organization. While strategy deals with strategic decisions.
  4. Policy is concerned with both thought and actions. While strategy is concerned mostly with action.
  5. A policy is what is, or what is not done. While a strategy is the methodology used to achieve a target as prescribed by a policy.

SWOT Analysis - Definition, Advantages and Limitations

SWOT is an acronym for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. By definition, Strengths (S) and Weaknesses (W) are considered to be internal factors over which you have some measure of control. Also, by definition, Opportunities (O) and Threats (T) are considered to be external factors over which you have essentially no control.
SWOT Analysis is the most renowned tool for audit and analysis of the overall strategic position of the business and its environment. Its key purpose is to identify the strategies that will create a firm specific business model that will best align an organization’s resources and capabilities to the requirements of the environment in which the firm operates.
In other words, it is the foundation for evaluating the internal potential and limitations and the probable/likely opportunities and threats from the external environment. It views all positive and negative factors inside and outside the firm that affect the success. A consistent study of the environment in which the firm operates helps in forecasting/predicting the changing trends and also helps in including them in the decision-making process of the organization.
An overview of the four factors (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) is given below-
  1. Strengths - Strengths are the qualities that enable us to accomplish the organization’s mission. These are the basis on which continued success can be made and continued/sustained.
    Strengths can be either tangible or intangible. These are what you are well-versed in or what you have expertise in, the traits and qualities your employees possess (individually and as a team) and the distinct features that give your organization its consistency.
    Strengths are the beneficial aspects of the organization or the capabilities of an organization, which includes human competencies, process capabilities, financial resources, products and services, customer goodwill and brand loyalty. Examples of organizational strengths are huge financial resources, broad product line, no debt, committed employees, etc.
  2. Weaknesses - Weaknesses are the qualities that prevent us from accomplishing our mission and achieving our full potential. These weaknesses deteriorate influences on the organizational success and growth. Weaknesses are the factors which do not meet the standards we feel they should meet.
    Weaknesses in an organization may be depreciating machinery, insufficient research and development facilities, narrow product range, poor decision-making, etc. Weaknesses are controllable. They must be minimized and eliminated. For instance - to overcome obsolete machinery, new machinery can be purchased. Other examples of organizational weaknesses are huge debts, high employee turnover, complex decision making process, narrow product range, large wastage of raw materials, etc.
  3. Opportunities - Opportunities are presented by the environment within which our organization operates. These arise when an organization can take benefit of conditions in its environment to plan and execute strategies that enable it to become more profitable. Organizations can gain competitive advantage by making use of opportunities.
    Organization should be careful and recognize the opportunities and grasp them whenever they arise. Selecting the targets that will best serve the clients while getting desired results is a difficult task. Opportunities may arise from market, competition, industry/government and technology. Increasing demand for telecommunications accompanied by deregulation is a great opportunity for new firms to enter telecom sector and compete with existing firms for revenue.
  4. Threats - Threats arise when conditions in external environment jeopardize the reliability and profitability of the organization’s business. They compound the vulnerability when they relate to the weaknesses. Threats are uncontrollable. When a threat comes, the stability and survival can be at stake. Examples of threats are - unrest among employees; ever changing technology; increasing competition leading to excess capacity, price wars and reducing industry profits; etc.

Advantages of SWOT Analysis

SWOT Analysis is instrumental in strategy formulation and selection. It is a strong tool, but it involves a great subjective element. It is best when used as a guide, and not as a prescription. Successful businesses build on their strengths, correct their weakness and protect against internal weaknesses and external threats. They also keep a watch on their overall business environment and recognize and exploit new opportunities faster than its competitors.
SWOT Analysis helps in strategic planning in following manner-
  1. It is a source of information for strategic planning.
  2. Builds organization’s strengths.
  3. Reverse its weaknesses.
  4. Maximize its response to opportunities.
  5. Overcome organization’s threats.
  6. It helps in identifying core competencies of the firm.
  7. It helps in setting of objectives for strategic planning.
  8. It helps in knowing past, present and future so that by using past and current data, future plans can be chalked out.
SWOT Analysis provide information that helps in synchronizing the firm’s resources and capabilities with the competitive environment in which the firm operates.
SWOT ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK

SWOT Analysis

Limitations of SWOT Analysis

SWOT Analysis is not free from its limitations. It may cause organizations to view circumstances as very simple because of which the organizations might overlook certain key strategic contact which may occur. Moreover, categorizing aspects as strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats might be very subjective as there is great degree of uncertainty in market. SWOT Analysis does stress upon the significance of these four aspects, but it does not tell how an organization can identify these aspects for itself.
There are certain limitations of SWOT Analysis which are not in control of management. These include-
  1. Price increase;
  2. Inputs/raw materials;
  3. Government legislation;
  4. Economic environment;
  5. Searching a new market for the product which is not having overseas market due to import restrictions; etc.
Internal limitations may include-
  1. Insufficient research and development facilities;
  2. Faulty products due to poor quality control;
  3. Poor industrial relations;
  4. Lack of skilled and efficient labour; etc

BCG Matrix

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix is a four celled matrix (a 2 * 2 matrix) developed by BCG, USA. It is the most renowned corporate portfolio analysis tool. It provides a graphic representation for an organization to examine different businesses in it’s portfolio on the basis of their related market share and industry growth rates. It is a two dimensional analysis on management of SBU’s (Strategic Business Units). In other words, it is a comparative analysis of business potential and the evaluation of environment.
According to this matrix, business could be classified as high or low according to their industry growth rate and relative market share.
Relative Market Share = SBU Sales this year leading competitors sales this year.

Market Growth Rate = Industry sales this year - Industry Sales last year.
The analysis requires that both measures be calculated for each SBU. The dimension of business strength, relative market share, will measure comparative advantage indicated by market dominance. The key theory underlying this is existence of an experience curve and that market share is achieved due to overall cost leadership.
BCG matrix has four cells, with the horizontal axis representing relative market share and the vertical axis denoting market growth rate. The mid-point of relative market share is set at 1.0. if all the SBU’s are in same industry, the average growth rate of the industry is used. While, if all the SBU’s are located in different industries, then the mid-point is set at the growth rate for the economy.
Resources are allocated to the business units according to their situation on the grid. The four cells of this matrix have been called as stars, cash cows, question marks and dogs. Each of these cells represents a particular type of business.
BCG Matrix
                10 x                                  1 x                                  0.1 x
Figure: BCG Matrix
  1. Stars- Stars represent business units having large market share in a fast growing industry. They may generate cash but because of fast growing market, stars require huge investments to maintain their lead. Net cash flow is usually modest. SBU’s located in this cell are attractive as they are located in a robust industry and these business units are highly competitive in the industry. If successful, a star will become a cash cow when the industry matures.
  2. Cash Cows- Cash Cows represents business units having a large market share in a mature, slow growing industry. Cash cows require little investment and generate cash that can be utilized for investment in other business units. These SBU’s are the corporation’s key source of cash, and are specifically the core business. They are the base of an organization. These businesses usually follow stability strategies. When cash cows loose their appeal and move towards deterioration, then a retrenchment policy may be pursued.
  3. Question Marks- Question marks represent business units having low relative market share and located in a high growth industry. They require huge amount of cash to maintain or gain market share. They require attention to determine if the venture can be viable. Question marks are generally new goods and services which have a good commercial prospective. There is no specific strategy which can be adopted. If the firm thinks it has dominant market share, then it can adopt expansion strategy, else retrenchment strategy can be adopted. Most businesses start as question marks as the company tries to enter a high growth market in which there is already a market-share. If ignored, then question marks may become dogs, while if huge investment is made, then they have potential of becoming stars.
  4. Dogs- Dogs represent businesses having weak market shares in low-growth markets. They neither generate cash nor require huge amount of cash. Due to low market share, these business units face cost disadvantages. Generally retrenchment strategies are adopted because these firms can gain market share only at the expense of competitor’s/rival firms. These business firms have weak market share because of high costs, poor quality, ineffective marketing, etc. Unless a dog has some other strategic aim, it should be liquidated if there is fewer prospects for it to gain market share. Number of dogs should be avoided and minimized in an organization.

Limitations of BCG Matrix

The BCG Matrix produces a framework for allocating resources among different business units and makes it possible to compare many business units at a glance. But BCG Matrix is not free from limitations, such as-
  1. BCG matrix classifies businesses as low and high, but generally businesses can be medium also. Thus, the true nature of business may not be reflected.
  2. Market is not clearly defined in this model.
  3. High market share does not always leads to high profits. There are high costs also involved with high market share.
  4. Growth rate and relative market share are not the only indicators of profitability. This model ignores and overlooks other indicators of profitability.
  5. At times, dogs may help other businesses in gaining competitive advantage. They can earn even more than cash cows sometimes.
  6. This four-celled approach is considered as to be too simplistic.

 Internal & External Analysis of Environment

Organizational environment consists of both external and internal factors. Environment must be scanned so as to determine development and forecasts of factors that will influence organizational success. Environmental scanning refers to possession and utilization of information about occasions, patterns, trends, and relationships within an organization’s internal and external environment. It helps the managers to decide the future path of the organization. Scanning must identify the threats and opportunities existing in the environment. While strategy formulation, an organization must take advantage of the opportunities and minimize the threats. A threat for one organization may be an opportunity for another.
Internal analysis of the environment is the first step of environment scanning. Organizations should observe the internal organizational environment. This includes employee interaction with other employees, employee interaction with management, manager interaction with other managers, and management interaction with shareholders, access to natural resources, brand awareness, organizational structure, main staff, operational potential, etc. Also, discussions, interviews, and surveys can be used to assess the internal environment. Analysis of internal environment helps in identifying strengths and weaknesses of an organization.
As business becomes more competitive, and there are rapid changes in the external environment, information from external environment adds crucial elements to the effectiveness of long-term plans. As environment is dynamic, it becomes essential to identify competitors’ moves and actions. Organizations have also to update the core competencies and internal environment as per external environment. Environmental factors are infinite, hence, organization should be agile and vigile to accept and adjust to the environmental changes. For instance - Monitoring might indicate that an original forecast of the prices of the raw materials that are involved in the product are no more credible, which could imply the requirement for more focused scanning, forecasting and analysis to create a more trustworthy prediction about the input costs. In a similar manner, there can be changes in factors such as competitor’s activities, technology, market tastes and preferences.
While in external analysis, three correlated environment should be studied and analyzed —
  • immediate / industry environment
  • national environment
  • broader socio-economic environment / macro-environment
Examining the industry environment needs an appraisal of the competitive structure of the organization’s industry, including the competitive position of a particular organization and it’s main rivals. Also, an assessment of the nature, stage, dynamics and history of the industry is essential. It also implies evaluating the effect of globalization on competition within the industry. Analyzing the national environment needs an appraisal of whether the national framework helps in achieving competitive advantage in the globalized environment. Analysis of macro-environment includes exploring macro-economic, social, government, legal, technological and international factors that may influence the environment. The analysis of organization’s external environment reveals opportunities and threats for an organization.
Strategic managers must not only recognize the present state of the environment and their industry but also be able to predict its future positions.

26 Aralık 2018 Çarşamba

SOCIOCULTURAL FACTORS

SOME SOCIOCULTURAL FACTORS TO BE ANALYZED 

→ Values
→ Social Perception to Various Events
→ Tastes
→ Community Behaviors
→ Attitudes
→ Life styles

INTERNATIONAL FACTORS

SOME INTERNATIONAL FACTORS TO BE ANALYZED

→ Economic And Political Integrations
→ Economical and Political Barriers
→ Clear and Present Danger in the Territory
→ Globalization Trends
→ Inter-Country Conflicts
→ International Trade Regulations

TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS

SOME TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS TO BE ANALYZED 


→ Global Technological Developments
→ Changes And Discoveries In The Production Technologies
→ Changes And Discoveries In Communication And Information
→ Changes And Discoveries In Managerial Sciences

DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS

SOME DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS  TO BE ANALYZED

→ Population
→ Income Level
→ Special Interest Group
→ Ethnical Identıty
→ Age Groups
→ Average Level Of Education

BUSINESS ETHICS


Business Ethics- A successful way of conducting business  

Definition of Business Ethics

Business Ethics refers to carrying business as per self-acknowledged moral standards. It is actually a structure of moral principles and code of conduct applicable to a business. Business ethics are applicable not only to the manner the business relates to a customer but also to the society at large. It is the worth of right and wrong things from business point of view.
Business ethics not only talk about the code of conduct at workplace but also with the clients and associates. Companies which present factual information, respect everyone and thoroughly adhere to the rules and regulations are renowned for high ethical standards. Business ethics implies conducting business in a manner beneficial to the societal as well as business interests.
Every strategic decision has a moral consequence. The main aim of business ethics is to provide people with the means for dealing with the moral complications. Ethical decisions in a business have implications such as satisfied work force, high sales, low regulation cost, more customers and high goodwill.
Some of ethical issues for business are relation of employees and employers, interaction between organization and customers, interaction between organization and shareholders, work environment, environmental issues, bribes, employees rights protection, product safety etc.
Below is a list of some significant ethical principles to be followed for a successful business-
  1. Protect the basic rights of the employees/workers.
  2. Follow health, safety and environmental standards.
  3. Continuously improvise the products, operations and production facilities to optimize the resource consumption
  4. Do not replicate the packaging style so as to mislead the consumers.
  5. Indulge in truthful and reliable advertising.
  6. Strictly adhere to the product safety standards.
  7. Accept new ideas. Encourage feedback from both employees as well as customers.
  8. Present factual information. Maintain accurate and true business records.
  9. Treat everyone (employees, partners and customers) with respect and integrity.
  10. The mission and vision of the company should be very clear to it.
  11. Do not get engaged in business relationships that lead to conflicts of interest. Discourage black marketing, corruption and hoarding.
  12. Meet all the commitments and obligations timely.
  13. Encourage free and open competition. Do not ruin competitors’ image by fraudulent practices.
  14. The policies and procedures of the Company should be updated regularly.
  15. Maintain confidentiality of personal data and proprietary records held by the company.
  16. Do not accept child labour, forced labour or any other human right abuses.

24 Aralık 2018 Pazartesi

STRATEGIC DECISION

Strategic Decisions - Definition and Characteristics

Strategic decisions are the decisions that are concerned with whole environment in which the firm operates, the entire resources and the people who form the company and the interface between the two.

Characteristics/Features of Strategic Decisions

  1. Strategic decisions have major resource propositions for an organization. These decisions may be concerned with possessing new resources, organizing others or reallocating others.
  2. Strategic decisions deal with harmonizing organizational resource capabilities with the threats and opportunities.
  3. Strategic decisions deal with the range of organizational activities. It is all about what they want the organization to be like and to be about.
  4. Strategic decisions involve a change of major kind since an organization operates in ever-changing environment.
  5. Strategic decisions are complex in nature.
  6. Strategic decisions are at the top most level, are uncertain as they deal with the future, and involve a lot of risk.
  7. Strategic decisions are different from administrative and operational decisions. Administrative decisions are routine decisions which help or rather facilitate strategic decisions or operational decisions. Operational decisions are technical decisions which help execution of strategic decisions. To reduce cost is a strategic decision which is achieved through operational decision of reducing the number of employees and how we carry out these reductions will be administrative decision.
The differences between Strategic, Administrative and Operational decisions can be summarized as follows-
Strategic Decisions
Administrative Decisions
Operational Decisions
Strategic decisions are long-term decisions.
Administrative decisions are taken daily.
Operational decisions are not frequently taken.
These are considered where The future planning is concerned.
These are short-term based Decisions.
These are medium-period based decisions.
Strategic decisions are taken in Accordance with organizational mission and vision.
These are taken according to strategic and operational Decisions.
These are taken in accordance with strategic and administrative decision.
These are related to overall Counter planning of all Organization.
These are related to working of employees in an Organization.
These are related to production.
These deal with organizational Growth.
These are in welfare of employees working in an organization.
These are related to production and factory growth.

STRATEGY FORMULATION & STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION

Following are the main differences between Strategy Formulation and Strategy Implementation-
Strategy FormulationStrategy Implementation
Strategy Formulation includes planning and decision-making involved in developing organization’s strategic goals and plans.Strategy Implementation involves all those means related to executing the strategic plans.
In short, Strategy Formulation is placing the Forces before the action.In short, Strategy Implementation is managing forces during the action.
Strategy Formulation is an Entrepreneurial Activity based on strategic decision-making.Strategic Implementation is mainly an Administrative Taskbased on strategic and operational decisions.
Strategy Formulation emphasizes on effectiveness.Strategy Implementation emphasizes on efficiency.
Strategy Formulation is a rational process.Strategy Implementation is basically an operational process.
Strategy Formulation requires co-ordination among few individuals.Strategy Implementation requires co-ordination among many individuals.
Strategy Formulation requires a great deal of initiative and logical skills.Strategy Implementation requires specific motivational and leadership traits.
Strategic Formulation precedes Strategy Implementation.STrategy Implementation follows Strategy Formulation.

STRATEGY STATEMENT

COMPONENTS OF A STRATEGY STATEMENT

The strategy statement of a firm sets the firm’s long-term strategic direction and broad policy directions. It gives the firm a clear sense of direction and a blueprint for the firm’s activities for the upcoming years. The main constituents of a strategic statement are as follows:
  1. Strategic Intent

    An organization’s strategic intent is the purpose that it exists and why it will continue to exist, providing it maintains a competitive advantage. Strategic intent gives a picture about what an organization must get into immediately in order to achieve the company’s vision. It motivates the people. It clarifies the vision of the vision of the company.
    Strategic intent helps management to emphasize and concentrate on the priorities. Strategic intent is, nothing but, the influencing of an organization’s resource potential and core competencies to achieve what at first may seem to be unachievable goals in the competitive environment. A well expressed strategic intent should guide/steer the development of strategic intent or the setting of goals and objectives that require that all of organization’s competencies be controlled to maximum value.
    Strategic intent includes directing organization’s attention on the need of winning; inspiring people by telling them that the targets are valuable; encouraging individual and team participation as well as contribution; and utilizing intent to direct allocation of resources.
    Strategic intent differs from strategic fit in a way that while strategic fit deals with harmonizing available resources and potentials to the external environment, strategic intent emphasizes on building new resources and potentials so as to create and exploit future opportunities.
  2. Mission Statement

    Mission statement is the statement of the role by which an organization intends to serve it’s stakeholders. It describes why an organization is operating and thus provides a framework within which strategies are formulated. It describes what the organization does (i.e., present capabilities), who all it serves (i.e., stakeholders) and what makes an organization unique (i.e., reason for existence).
    A mission statement differentiates an organization from others by explaining its broad scope of activities, its products, and technologies it uses to achieve its goals and objectives. It talks about an organization’s present (i.e., “about where we are”). For instance, Microsoft’s mission is to help people and businesses throughout the world to realize their full potential. Wal-Mart’s mission is “To give ordinary folk the chance to buy the same thing as rich people.” Mission statements always exist at top level of an organization, but may also be made for various organizational levels. Chief executive plays a significant role in formulation of mission statement. Once the mission statement is formulated, it serves the organization in long run, but it may become ambiguous with organizational growth and innovations.
    In today’s dynamic and competitive environment, mission may need to be redefined. However, care must be taken that the redefined mission statement should have original fundamentals/components. Mission statement has three main components-a statement of mission or vision of the company, a statement of the core values that shape the acts and behaviour of the employees, and a statement of the goals and objectives.

    Features of a Mission

    1. Mission must be feasible and attainable. It should be possible to achieve it.
    2. Mission should be clear enough so that any action can be taken.
    3. It should be inspiring for the management, staff and society at large.
    4. It should be precise enough, i.e., it should be neither too broad nor too narrow.
    5. It should be unique and distinctive to leave an impact in everyone’s mind.
    6. It should be analytical,i.e., it should analyze the key components of the strategy.
    7. It should be credible, i.e., all stakeholders should be able to believe it.
  3. Vision

    A vision statement identifies where the organization wants or intends to be in future or where it should be to best meet the needs of the stakeholders. It describes dreams and aspirations for future. For instance, Microsoft’s vision is “to empower people through great software, any time, any place, or any device.” Wal-Mart’s vision is to become worldwide leader in retailing.
    A vision is the potential to view things ahead of themselves. It answers the question “where we want to be”. It gives us a reminder about what we attempt to develop. A vision statement is for the organization and it’s members, unlike the mission statement which is for the customers/clients. It contributes in effective decision making as well as effective business planning. It incorporates a shared understanding about the nature and aim of the organization and utilizes this understanding to direct and guide the organization towards a better purpose. It describes that on achieving the mission, how the organizational future would appear to be.
    An effective vision statement must have following features-
    1. It must be unambiguous.
    2. It must be clear.
    3. It must harmonize with organization’s culture and values.
    4. The dreams and aspirations must be rational/realistic.
    5. Vision statements should be shorter so that they are easier to memorize.

    In order to realize the vision, it must be deeply instilled in the organization, being owned and shared by everyone involved in the organization.
  4. Goals and Objectives

    A goal is a desired future state or objective that an organization tries to achieve. Goals specify in particular what must be done if an organization is to attain mission or vision. Goals make mission more prominent and concrete. They co-ordinate and integrate various functional and departmental areas in an organization. Well made goals have following features-
    1. These are precise and measurable.
    2. These look after critical and significant issues.
    3. These are realistic and challenging.
    4. These must be achieved within a specific time frame.
    5. These include both financial as well as non-financial components.
    Objectives are defined as goals that organization wants to achieve over a period of time. These are the foundation of planning. Policies are developed in an organization so as to achieve these objectives. Formulation of objectives is the task of top level management. Effective objectives have following features-
    1. These are not single for an organization, but multiple.
    2. Objectives should be both short-term as well as long-term.
    3. Objectives must respond and react to changes in environment, i.e., they must be flexible.
    4. These must be feasible, realistic and operational.

CUTTING COSTS

Cutting Costs Strategically

The business environment today has become extremely competitive. Companies are not only facing competition from their local competitors but also from global ones. Different economic and geopolitical factors make global supply chains necessary. The problem with having global supply chains is that operations become broad and complex. It is much easier to manage operations located in the same geography rather than those located in multiple countries.
Rising costs and increasing competitiveness are making it mandatory for companies to cut costs. Corporations also agree that up to 25% of their expenditures are wasteful in nature and could be eliminated. The problem is that they do not know which 25%? Cutting the wrong kind of costs can lead to a decline in quality or customer service, both of which are sure to reflect as declining sales in the near future. In this article, we will understand the concept of strategic cost cutting and how it adds value, especially to global supply chains.

The Problem with Cost Cutting

Cost cutting can be very ugly if proper attention is not paid to how it is done. For instance, cost-cutting can lead to job losses. It can also lead to suppliers not being paid on time and so on. The common link in ugly cost cutting is that the company tries to benefit by undermining somebody else’s interest. In the short-run, it might appear that every dollar saved will directly add to the bottom line. However, in the long-run, one will see the quality of products and services dropping drastically. Thus, cost cutting if done incorrectly can cause the revenue of the company to fall. The damage done could be severe if the company begins to lose loyal customers. The cost of acquiring loyal customers is increasingly high nowadays!

Competency Based Approach

Costs should not be blindly cut. Instead, cost cutting should follow a strategy. That means that every single cost reduction must be a step towards achieving a larger goal. The common goal that most successful companies pursue is when they decide to align with their competencies. Large multinational companies do a lot of things. For instance, consider a company like Nike. It is in the business of marketing sportswear. However, the company does not manufacture any of the products it sells. The company identifies itself as a marketing company. All the other functions which do not align with this competency are outsourced. The key thing to note is that Nike keeps its marketing department extremely well-funded. The core competencies are provided the resources to be the best in the global marketplace. Other less strategic tasks are outsourced to cut costs. This enables Nike to cut costs where things matter less and to redirect the financial muscle to future investments that will allow the business to thrive and to grow even faster.

What is a Competency ?

A competency is a difficult thing to define. The difficulty is due to the wide nature of qualities that can be included in the competency. It could be related to people, technology, know-how or processes! It is something that the company excels at relative to its peers. Every company must necessarily have a competency. It is not possible to survive in this cut-throat marketplace without having some core competency. It must be recognized that competencies are all about focus. Companies can have a handful of competencies at most. If you have a list of competencies, then you probably have not defined your competencies right!

The Tradeoffs

Strategic cost cutting means that the companies can differentiate between the costs that they need to incur to survive. This would companies can identify mundane expenses like electricity, fuel, accounting costs, regulatory costs, etc. and contrast it with costs related to competencies.
The idea is to funnel all the money towards competency building and be as lean as possible in other expenses. Overheads must be identified, and incessant cost-cutting must be undertaken in those fields. However, at the same time, the competencies that allow the company to outmaneuver the competition should be developed over the long term regardless of the costs.

Disadvantages of Strategic Cost Cutting

Higher Management Buy In

Strategic cost cutting is a decision that needs to be made by the entire organization. The top management has to be involved in this approach. The middle management can execute this strategy on their own to some extent. However, they will have to interact with the other areas of the organization which is not within their control. This is where strategic cost cutting would fail. An AVP or a VP cannot implement this strategy by themselves. Instead, this strategy would only work if the decisions are driven from the top i.e. from the CEO or the board of directors themselves. Getting a buy-in at that level is not very easy. Hence relatively fewer companies indulge in this activity.

Time Frame

Strategic cost cutting does not work overnight. It takes years to build competencies that outmaneuver the competition. The problem is that most companies run with the short term in mind. They are only focused on their quarterly or annual results. If immediate cost reduction is the objective, there are huge limitations as to what this approach can achieve.
To sum it up, organizations must never cut costs in their core areas. They must identify administrative and non-critical areas and make the organization as lean as possible by focusing on those areas.